Skip to content

An Open Letter to Kevin Kallsen of Anglican.TV

by Carson T. Clark on January 15, 2012

Dear Kevin,

Greetings in Christ! Let me preface my exhortation by noting five things:1

  1. 1.For the record, Kevin and I are facebook friends. I sent him a congenial message beforehand letting him know this blog post was coming.Although I’ve never hidden my affinity for the ACNA, I’m presently aspiring to Holy Orders within the Anglican Mission.22.My hope is that the AM will reunify with ACNA this June, as Bishop Murphy alluded to.
  2. This week I attended the Anglican School of Ministry’s pre-conference liturgics workshop, then stayed for the entire Winter Conference.33.I think it appropriate to share publicy that I left the conference feeling somewhat underwhelmed. In my humble opinion, that which was necessary was not fully accomplished. Namely, a five-fold objective of 1) clarifying what the heck actually happened, 2) solemnly apologizing for accidental mistakes, 3) asking forgiveness, 4) offering a clear denunciation of an autonomous spirit, and 5) making an absolute commitment to pursuing ecclesiastical unity moving forward. I thought the overall spiritual pep rally feel was… untimely? That’s just my opinion, though.
  3. Though I support the AM’s vision of becoming a missionary society, I’m none too pleased with the recent developments in terms of how the leadership has actually gone about that restructuring.
  4. I’m thankful for your ministry at Anglican TV, hold no personal resentment toward you, and hope you will receive this letter as one brother in Christ encouraging, or perhaps even gently challenging, another.
  5. This post isn’t intended as a rebuke.

I share these things to acknowledge my presuppositions and commitments, identify my perspective, distance myself from the rampant ungodly behavior within the blogosphere, and, most importantly, to try to model a better way of conducting oneself in this medium.44.As Christians I believe in the rigorous pursuit of truth moored in love, humility, grace, compassion, and civility, and experienced in community. I hope you will sense this challenging yet irenic spirit characterizing this letter.

May I offer a suggestion? I can report as a firsthand witness that a number of Anglican Mission folks–clergy and laity alike–feel hurt by things you’ve written and said.55.The key word there being “feel.” As counselors often point out, whether or not there’s justification for those feelings is, in my estimate, largely immaterial. I would encourage you to write a blog post addressing them. Please don’t hear me as asking you to apologize. That’s not at all my intent. Rather, my suggestion is that you express three things. Let them know that you…

  1. Genuinely care for those persons within the AM who are hurting right now. Sometimes in dealing with all the macro-level church crap I think we loose sight of the tragic consequences on the micro-level.66.It seems to me that we’re all guilty of waxing poetically about canon law, ecclesiology, and the actions of bishops while forgetting the real people in the pews who are impacted. Lord, be merciful! Without being condescending or dividing them from their leadership to whom most remain committed, let them know that you genuinely love them, care for them, and are praying for them. Trust me, they really need to hear that from you.
  2. Don’t have an axe to grind against the AM, if in fact you don’t.77.I don’t think this is the case. During those trying times when tensions mount, confrontations grow, and emotions become raw, most people seem to have their loyalties galvanized.88.Personally, I’m not a “party man,” by which I mean that I don’t have a strong sense of loyalty to anyone or anything but Christ and His Kingdom. I don’t take personal offense at much, but I’ve become increasingly aware that this response is atypical. Consequently, even well-intentioned, factually accurate, responsible criticisms are received as a personal affront. Unfortunately, that’s precisely how a great many persons within the AM view your blog posts and Anglican Unscripted videos.
  3. Are committed to unity and reconciliation within the Body of Christ. Let me shoot straight with you. I’m pretty darn sure this isn’t your intention, but on more than a rare occasion you (and George) come across like you revel not only in reporting these tragic news stories, but also in the commentary you offer on them.99. I think this largely is an inadvertent reflection of your easy-going, smiling nature. And by the way, kudos for doing a good job recently distinguishing between news and commentary, by the way. It hasn’t gone unnoticed. Seriously, sometimes it seems like you delight in the Church’s division. They need to know that isn’t the case.

Remember Paul’s exhortation in Romans 12: “If possible, so far as it depends on you, live peaceably with all.” For better or worse, you have assumed a place of preeminence within the Anglican world. People look to you for information.1010.Remember that Luke 12:48 teaches that to everyone who much is given and entrusted, much will be demanded and asked. The solemn task to which I encourage you is to not only love and support your brothers and sisters in Christ within the Anglican Mission, but to do everything in your ability to let them know that you stand beside them during these troubling times.

Grace & Peace,

Carson

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=689501306 James Coder

    Carson,

    Have a look at the first video that Kevin and George made breaking the initial news regarding the Pawley Island meeting – and then the next one, where they discuss the backlash and the letter from Cynthia Brust. Here, they make quite clear their attitudes toward those in the AM. I think that Kevin may have already adequately expressed his love of the AM folk – and were he to go repeating this over and over, this itself could also lead to misunderstandings (e.g., how about the feelings of those in groups other than the AM?). You could help your brothers and sisters in the AM by reminding them of these expressions.

    When churches are in pain, there’s often a lot of behind-the-scenes expressions of discontent regarding various persons. But until there is some well-founded and well-worded complaint, it may simply be inappropriate to respond to reported discontent … I’d suggest that it would be much better for a person within the AM who does indeed feel that the AM has been mistreated, to put together a letter clearly outlining specific quotes etc. etc.. That could also help Kevin and George re-think things in a meaningful way. My inclination here, inspired by Matthew 18, would be to try to keep handling of grievances as direct and transparent as possible. Reacting to reported grievances falls short of that.

    James

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=689501306 James Coder

      nb – anyone who would like to do this – the job can be made easier of finding actual video segments if one uses the youtube videos (simply do a google video search for anglican unscripted and find the correct episode number) and link to the appropriate spot with TubeChop – http://tubechop.com/.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=163800401 Carson T. Clark

      James,

      Hello. Let me interact with some of what you’ve said:

      “Kevin and George… make quite clear their attitudes toward those in the AM. I think that Kevin may have already adequately expressed his love of the AM folk…”

      I would suggest that a situation has arisen such that it bears repeating… often.

      “(e.g., how about the feelings of those in groups other than the AM?)”

      Believe me. This is something I brought up time and again in Houston.

      “You could help your brothers and sisters in the AM by reminding them of these expressions.”

      I have, and I will continue to do so!

      “I’d suggest that it would be much better for a person within the AM who does indeed feel that the AM has been mistreated, to put together a letter clearly outlining specific quotes etc.”

      My hope is that others who feel that way will articulate such felt grievances. I don’t so I won’t.

      “My inclination here, inspired by Matthew 18, would be to try to keep handling of grievances as direct and transparent as possible. Reacting to reported grievances falls short of that.”

      I don’t believe we’re on the same page. Let me try to clarify me intention.

      I believe Kevin knows that I love and respect him, and do not believe he possesses ill will toward anyone in the Anglican Mission. This post is not, then, a rebuke nor an overt criticism–otherwise I would’ve done it privately as is my pattern. What I’m dealing with is the fine line between reality and perception, original intent and interpretation. As you know, in the realm of communication the relationship between sender and receiver is always complex. What I’m encouraging Kevin to do is to go well out of his way, to do everything reasonably possible, to ensure that he’s being rightly understood by those whose perception is being skewed by their emotions and their loyalties.

      Also, this is an open letter. The genre has this joint purpose of speaking not only to the addressee, but to a larger audience. This letter is also intended to help AMiA persons realize how they’re allowing said emotions and loyalties to skew their view of what he’s saying. It’s as much of a corrective measure toward them as anyone.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=689501306 James Coder

      Carson,

      Thanks for your response and your clarification. Allow me to clarify myself as well – I wasn’t suggesting here re. Matt 18 that you are expressing a grievance yourself, you are indeed making clear perceptions of AM brethren and on the basis of these, bringing some suggestions to the fore.

      We’ll both be praying for more clarity and charity!

  • http://www.facebook.com/thomas.kortus Thomas Kortus

    As a former AMiA priest and now a priest under the direct care and oversight of the Anglican Church of Rwanda I have appreciated the ministry of Anglican TV and have felt and understood that Kevin and George love and care for the church enough to ask hard questions and expect purity and transparency. I support Kevin and George and I feel that the AM has responded terribly to this whole affair and am sorely disappointed and embarrassed by the leadership of the AM. There has been little transparency and openness by the AM in the past few years and especially in the midst of this great departure from the initial vision of the AMiA. Such was the lack of transparency that AM clergy were not given ANY way of speaking and sharing in the midst of this great change of vision and many of them turned to Anglican TV for help!

    But just to underscore – I have always understood that Anglican TV – Kevin and George- love the church – but they love it enough to seek its health and spiritual well being and that sometimes means initial discomfort and conflict. Pray for the unity of the church and for humility and peace – but in the midst of this there must be truth.

    Peace –

    thomas

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=163800401 Carson T. Clark

      Hello, Thomas.

      Welcome to my blog and thanks for commenting.

      Did you get a chance to read my reply to James below?

  • http://www.facebook.com/kkallsen Kevin Kallsen

    Carson,

    I don’t have a blog, so I will answer here and you can repost my answer elsewhere if you need.

    Each and every morning in prayer I kneel before God and remind Him that I am not worthy to serve Him. I am not worthy to press a record button or speak to the things I see in the church or the world. God quickly agrees I am not worthy, but He alone makes me worthy, He then asks me to get off my knees and Go. As I can do no other until the next morning when I am again on my knees.

    The content of my work in the Church and AnglicanTV stands solely by itself. Each of the your three requests are answered hundreds of times over hundreds of hours of video since 2005. By the Grace of God and the donations and prayers of ATV Viewers, I have traveled hundreds of thousands of miles to bring news, events and commentary that has been watched by nearly half a million viewers.

    But, please let me remind you again. I am not worthy to do any of this. I am a sinner with red knees and redeemed when I stand.

    I genuinely believe you are writing and expressing a desire to help me and the ministry of AnglicanTV serve better. And I thank you for that. It is needed. But your desire for a better ATV is also needed when I report on The Episcopal Church, The Archbishop of Canterbury, and other Christian news. It seems very strange and confusing that I only need Godly correction when I am reporting on AMiA and not other stories?

    But, please let me remind you again. I am not worthy to do any of this. I am a sinner with red knees and redeemed when I stand.

    I always believed that if there is a line for repentance — I should be the first in line. Indeed if there is a line for communion, encouragement, and prayer I should be there as well.

    Sharing His Victory,

    Kevin

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1407660929 David Knudtson

    Caron this was awesome. I am glad that I got to hang out with you in Liturgics training I hope we are friends for life!

%d bloggers like this: